Why Isn’t Brookings Labeled ‘Liberal’? Maybe Because It Isn’t
by NewsFeed on Mar.15, 2010, under Watchdog Related News Feed
New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt has not had a chance yet to respond to questions about his commentary on the ACORN hoax (FAIR Action Alert, 3/11/10), instead devoting his Sunday column (3/14/10) to a discussion of political labeling. It included this question:
Why is the American Enterprise Institute almost always called “conservative” in the Times, while the Brookings Institution seldom gets a label, although it has been described as a Democratic government in exile during Republican regimes?
First off, the right-wing AEI (Extra!, 3-4/99) is not “almost always called ‘conservative’ in the Times“; a Nexis search of the paper over the past year turns up 77 references to the think tank, of which 18 have the word “conservative” in the vicinity. Twenty-three percent of the time is not “almost always.”
And Brookings “has been described as a Democratic government in exile”–who, exactly, has described it thus? The only previous time that Brookings was described as a “government in exile” in the New York Times, it was a column (9/29/89) that said the think tank served as such for Democratic and Republican economists alike.
It would certainly be an odd shadow government for Democrats that provided a home for so many Republicans. While its current president, Strobe Talbott, was a deputy secretary of state in the Clinton administration, his predecessor, Michael Armacost, was an undersecretary of state under Reagan (Extra!, 11-12/98); the president before that, Bruce MacLaury, worked for Nixon’s Treasury Department (Extra!, 5/91). Brookings’ current roster of experts includes George W. Bush administration alumni like Ted Gayer, Mark McClellan and Ron Haskins–not to mention prominent Iraq War hawks Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack (Extra! Update, 10/07).

