Defending Limbaugh, right-wing media smear Foxman
by NewsFeed on Jan.26, 2010, under Watchdog Related News Feed
After Anti-Defamation League (ADL) national director Abraham Foxman criticized Rush Limbaugh for his January 20 statement that “a lot of those people on Wall Street are Jewish. So I wonder if there’s starting to be some buyer’s remorse there” — remarks Limbaugh later lied to defend — the right-wing media has rushed to defend Limbaugh and to attack Foxman. Foxman has been smeared as a “terrible Jew” and a “plague on his people,” and described as a “disgusting, craven little twerp.”
Limbaugh lies to defend
remarks Foxman denounced
Rush: Many “people
on Wall Street are Jewish. So I wonder if there’s starting to be some buyer’s
remorse” about Obama. From the January 20 edition of Premiere Radio Networks’ The Rush
Limbaugh Show:
LIMBAUGH:
If you have often wondered just out of, you know, a legitimately curious
political sense — if you have asked yourself why are so many Jewish people
liberal, when it seems that so much of what liberals do would be anathema to
Jewish people, particularly abortion, but any number of things — taxes, tax
increase. Lookit — you know something, folks? There are a lot of people, when
you say banker, people think Jewish. People who have prejudice, people who
have, you know — what’s the best way to say — a little prejudice about them.
To some people, bankers, code word for Jewish — and guess who Obama’s
assaulting? He’s assaulting bankers. He’s assaulting money people. And a lot of
those people on Wall Street are Jewish. So I wonder if there’s starting to be
some buyer’s remorse there.Anyway,
if you’ve — if you have often asked that question, if you’ve been puzzled by
so many Jewish people vote liberal or vote Democrat, you — give Norman’s book
a shot. It’s called, Why Jews Are Liberals [sic]. And he’s Jewish, and
he would know. And it’s — look, it’s a good read. And Norman is a — there’s no other way to say it
– he’s a profound intellectual but he’s not an egghead elitist. And he’s
written this book with an effort to have anybody that reads it understand
exactly what he is talking about.
Foxman blasted
Limbaugh’s “borderline anti-Semitic comments” as “offensive” and a
“new low.” On January 21, Foxman issued the following statement on behalf of the ADL:
Rush
Limbaugh reached a new low with his borderline anti-Semitic comments about Jews
as bankers, their supposed influence on Wall Street, and how they vote.Limbaugh’s
references to Jews and money in a discussion of Massachusetts politics were offensive and
inappropriate. While the age-old stereotype about Jews and money has a long and
sordid history, it also remains one of the main pillars of anti-Semitism and is
widely accepted by many Americans. His notion that Jews vote based on their
religion, rather than on their interests as Americans, plays into the hands of
anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists.When
he comes to understand why his words were so offensive and unacceptable,
Limbaugh should apologize.
Limbaugh lied in defense
of his comments about Jewish people on Wall Street. Calling for Foxman to
apologize to him, on January 22, Limbaugh falsely claimed that he was referring only to
what “Jew-haters” believe when he made comments about Jewish people
on Wall Street. In fact, while Limbaugh did discuss what he said people with
prejudice believe, he also clearly stated — as fact and in his own voice –
that “a lot of those people on Wall Street are Jewish. So I wonder if
there’s starting to be some buyer’s remorse there.”
Right-wing media respond
to Foxman’s criticism by smearing him, calling for his firing
Steyn: ADL should be
“ashamed” of themselves, should tell “buffoon” Foxman to “t[ake] an early
retirement.” Filling in for Limbaugh on the January 25 edition of The Rush Limbaugh
Show, Mark Steyn said of Foxman:
STEYN:
These are physically dangerous times for Jews in almost every other part of the
Western world, and this disgusting, craven little twerp thinks that the fount
of anti-Semitism is Rush Limbaugh. This guy is a buffoon. The ADL should be
ashamed of themselves, should be embarrassed at having this guy speaking for
them, and should say to him, “Look, whatever you did in the past, it’s gone
now, and we’d just as soon appreciate it if you took early
retirement.”
Geller claims “liberal Jews” like
Foxman have “sickness of the soul,” Jews are giving “blood
money” to “terrible Jew” Foxman. In a January 25 Newsmax
column, Pamela Gellar
defended Limbaugh as a “wonderful friend of the Jews” and cited Foxman as an
example of the “liberal Jews” she claims have a “sickness of the soul.” After
accusing Foxman of “demoniz[ing] Christian groups that love Israel but is
kowtowing to the Islamic jihad,” she asked: “Which Jews support deleterious
characters like Foxman? Which Jews give blood money to these self-hating
wretches? Who empowers these terrible Jews?” She concluded: “Mr. Foxman, please
step aside now for the sake of the Jews.”
The Corner’s Leeden: “I
want Foxman retired and replaced.” National Review contributing editor
Michael Leeden defended Rush in a January 22 post to The
Corner, saying that:
Rush
should be a hero to Foxman and American Jews, but they are so blindly partisan
that they can no longer distinguish between their friends and their enemies.[...]
Foxman
wants Rush to apologize. Nuts. I want Foxman retired and replaced by somebody
who fights for Jews and our friends.
Geller calls ADL’s Foxman “a
plague on our people” asks him to “step aside.” In her January 22
BigJournalism.com defense of Limbaugh,
Geller cited Foxman as the “most odious” of the “clear and present enemies of
the Jewish people among our senior ranks” whom American Jews have “tolerat[ed]
and support[ed].” Geller also called Foxman “a plague on our people,” and asked
that he “please step aside. Please step aside now, for the sake of the Jews.”
Big Journalism’s Shapiro: “Apologize
to Rush Limbaugh, Mr. Foxman,” his criticism “endangers Jews.” Syndicated columnist Ben Shapiro defended Limbaugh in a
BigJournalism.com post, saying that “Foxman’s statements are ridiculous,
insulting, and wrongheaded. He should apologize to Rush immediately.” To
support this claim, Shapiro stated that “Rush is indicting those who would
seize on Obama’s ‘bankers’ language to hurt Jews” — the same false argument
that Limbaugh previously used to defend his comments. He concluded: “The Jews
don’t have many friends outside the conservative movement in the United States.
When Foxman attacks those friends, he endangers Jews far more than he protects
them. And that is a betrayal of his mission and the trust that so much of the
Jewish community has placed in him.”
Breitbart tweet: “fire”
Foxman. In
a January 24 post to his Twitter feed, Andrew Breitbart linked to Shapiro’s piece, commenting:

Norman Podhoretz
demanded Foxman apologize to Rush. Commentary editor-at-large Norman
Podhoretz released a statement on Rush Limbaugh’s website on January 21, saying that
Limbaugh had been “subjected to a vile attack by Abraham Foxman.” He continued:
Now
Foxman has the chutzpah to denounce Rush Limbaugh as an anti-Semite and to
demand an apology from him to boot. Well, if an apology is owed here, it is the
national director of the Anti-Defamation League who should apologize for the
defamatory accusation of anti-Semitism that he himself has hurled against so
loyal a friend of Israel as Rush Limbaugh.

